Greg Ip on Goldman Sachs, Jan Hatzius, and Ben Stein
Hoisted from Comments: John from Cappadocia Emails About Victor Davis Hanson, Procopius of Caesarea, and Maureen Dowd

Ezra Klein: Republicans and Democrats Agree on Financial Reform - Republicans and Democrats agree on financial reform -- but is that a good thing?

On health care, Obama proposed to enact RomneyCare. On FinReg, the Republicans are proposing to replace the Dodd bill with the Dodd bill:

Ezra Klein: The important takeaway from the Republican FinReg proposal is that they ... basically agree with the Democrats. At least on the big-picture stuff. They agree that the correct questions for financial reform are "how much information, and how much power, do regulators have?" In fact, their main differences with the Democrats are when they give politicians and regulators more discretionary power than Dodd does. For instance, in the Dodd bill, the Treasury Department, FDIC and Federal Reserve all need to agree that a firm is failing in order for it to be taken over. In the Republican bill, the president and the D.C. district court also need to sign onto the decision. The question in both bills is whether there's any chance that the government will take down a firm before its imminent collapse sparks a crisis. It's too-big-to-fail meets too-hard-to-intervene.

Another example: In the Dodd bill, virtually all derivatives go through a clearinghouse so regulators can see what's happening and companies have to keep sufficient cash on hand to pay off their bets. In the Republican bill, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, and the Federal Reserve Board of Governors will write up regulations for which types of derivatives have to be cleared. So if you basically liked the Dodd bill but were looking to give regulators just a little bit more discretion, then the Republicans are here for you (for a more comprehensive side-by-side comparison, head here).