## Problem 4 on the Fall 2010 U.C. Berkeley Econ 1 Final...

The answer--or, at least, what I think the answer is (yes, it is cruel and unusual to ask fresh-men and -women and sophomores to do all all 8 parts in 2:30 for each part):

Let me tell you what I thought the answers to problem 4 were...

(4) Suppose that the number of espresso drinks demanded and supplied in the university city of Tall Stick are given by the equations:

Qd= 20,000 - 2000P

Qs= -10,000 + 8000P   (a) What is the market equilibrium price?

ANSWER: 30,000 = 10000P. P = $3/drink. (b) What is the market equilibrium quantity? ANSWER: 20000 - 2000(3) = Q. 14000 drinks (c) What is the producer surplus? ANSWER: The lowest-cost producer has a cost of$1.25. The highest-cost producer has a cost of $3. The average cost for producers is thus$2.12 1/2. A price of $3 gives average producer surplus of$0.87 1/2 per drink. Multiply by 14000 drinks and get $12,250 (d) What is the consumer surplus? ANSWER: The highest-value consumer has a value of$10. The lowest-value consumer has a value of $3. The average value for consumers is thus$6.50. There are thus $3.50 of consumer surplus per drink. Multiply by 14000 drinks and get$49000.

(e) Suppose that the university students of Crony Capitalism University in Tall Stick, hyped up on caffeine, begin trashing the town and the city of Tall Stick imposes a $1 per drink graffiti clean-up tax on espresso drinks. What is the new market equilibrium price? ANSWER: We now have 20000 - 2000(P+1) = -10000 + 8000P. 10000P = 28000. P =$2.80. (P to consumers is now $3.80) (d) Suppose that the university students of Crony Capitalism University in Tall Stick, hyped up on caffeine, begin trashing the town and the city of Tall Stick imposes a$1 per drink graffiti clean-up tax on espresso drinks. What is the new market equilibrium quantity?

ANSWER: -10000 + 8000(2.80) = 12,400 drinks

(g) Suppose that the university students of Crony Capitalism University in Tall Stick, hyped up on caffeine, begin trashing the town and the city of Tall Stick imposes a $1 per drink graffiti clean-up tax on espresso drinks. What is the new total surplus assuming that$1 of government revenue has the same social value as $1 of consumer or producer surplus? ANSWER: An extra-credit answer points out that we do not know whether the$1/drink tax is the right Pigouvian tax or not, and then goes on to solve the problem making some assumption about what graffiti-damage-per-drink is. An answer that gets full credit assumes that $1 per drink is the right Pigouvian tax, in which case we have: Producer surplus: 12400 x (2.80 - 1/2 x (2.80 + 1.25)) = 9610 Consumer surplus: 12400 x (1/2 x (3.80 + 10) - 3.80)) = 38440 Graffiti damage: -12400 Value of cleanup: 12400 Total: 48050 (h) In (g), what must be the value of each$1 spent by the city of Tall Stick on graffiti cleanup for the decision to impose the $1 per drink tax and then spend all the revenue on graffiti cleanup to raise social welfare? ANSWER: Once again, an extra-credit answer points out that we do not know whether the$1/drink tax is the right Pigouvian tax or not, and then goes on to solve the problem making some assumption about what graffiti-damage-per-drink is. An answer that gets full credit assumes that $1 per drink is the right Pigouvian tax, in which case we have: Surplus with tax: 48050 + (b-1)(government revenue), where b is the value of$1 spent on graffiti cleanup

Surplus without tax: 49000+12250-14000 = 47250

48050 + (b-1)(revenue) = 47250
800 = (1-b)12400
1-b = 800/12400
1-b = .06129
b = 0.9355

So as long as $1 of cleanup does at least$0.9355 worth of graffiti removal, the tax is a good idea (although not necessarily the best idea).