Ryan Avent Is Shrill: The Default Republican Position Is a Set of Thoroughly Discredited Fringe Beliefs that Would Prove Economically Disastrous
Austin Frakt Is Shrill: Fred Barnes Knows Nothing: Voucherizing Medicare Is Not Like Part D

Justin Wolfers Is Shrill: John Taylor Does Not Know What He Is Talking About Edition

Freakonomics  How to Spot Advocacy Science John Taylor Edition

Safari 1

Justin Wolfers writes:

Freakonomics » How to Spot Advocacy Science: John Taylor Edition: Be wary of economists wielding short samples.

And Justin comments:

Sometimes you see the perfect piece of evidence. The scatter plot that is just so. The data line up perfectly. And then you realize, perhaps they’re just too perfect. What you are seeing is advocacy, dressed up as science. Here’s an example, provided by John Taylor (via Greg Mankiw).... What conclusions should we draw about this relationship? And now why do you think Taylor began his sample in 1990? Actually, we should use all the available data. The chart below goes back to 1948, when these series—in their current form—began....

Here’s Mankiw’s assessment of Taylor’s claim:

There’s no doubt that the strength of the correlation is impressive.

But when you look beyond the cherry-picked sample, the correlation is a decidedly unimpressive -0.14.