Bruce Bartlett: This Government Shutdown Will Defeat the GOP in 2014: Noted
"Less Like California": The View from the Roasterie **La Farine** VI: Reverse Overland Trail Immigrant Weblogging

Michael Lind: Tea Party radicalism is misunderstood: Meet the “Newest Right”: Noted

Michael Lind: Tea Party radicalism is misunderstood: Meet the “Newest Right”:

To judge from the commentary inspired by the shutdown, most progressives and centrists, and even many non-Tea Party conservatives, do not understand the radical force that has captured the Republican Party and paralyzed the federal government. Having grown up in what is rapidly becoming a Tea Party heartland–Texas–I think I do understand it…. The Newest Right is the simply the old Jeffersonian-Jacksonian right….

The Tea Party right is not only disproportionately Southern but also disproportionately upscale. Its social base consists of what, in other countries, are called the “local notables”… the Big Mules, as the Southern populist Big Jim Folsom once described the lords of the local car dealership, country club and chamber of commerce… are more likely to be millionaires than billionaires, more likely to run low-wage construction or auto supply businesses than multinational corporations. They are second-tier people on a national level but first-tier people in their states and counties and cities. For nearly a century, from the end of Reconstruction, when white Southern terrorism drove federal troops out of the conquered South, until the Civil Rights Revolution, the South’s local notables maintained their control over a region of the U.S. larger than Western Europe by means of segregation, disenfranchisement, and bloc voting and the filibuster at the federal level….

By the 2000s, demography destroyed the temporary Nixon-to-Bush conservative majority… in the long run the Republican Party cannot win without attracting more black and Latino support. That may well happen, in the long run. But right now most conservative white local notables in the South and elsewhere in the country don’t want black and Latino support. They would rather disenfranchise blacks and Latinos…. And they would rather dismantle the federal government than surrender their local power and privilege…. It is a perfectly rational strategy, given its goal: maximizing the political power and wealth of white local notables who find themselves living in states, and eventually a nation, with present or potential nonwhite majorities….

The tool kit of the older Southern white right is pretty much the same as that of the Newest Right: The Solid South…. The Filibuster…. Disenfranchisement…. Localization and privatization of federal programs….

Today the white notables of the South increasingly live in states like Texas, which already have nonwhite majorities. They fear that Obama’s election, like Lincoln’s, foreshadows the emergence of a new national majority coalition that excludes them and will act against their interest. Having been reduced to the status of members of a minority race, they fear they will next lose their status as members of the dominant local class…. The package as a whole… represents a coherent and rational strategy for maximizing the relative power of provincial white elites at a time when their numbers are in decline and history has turned against them. They are not ignoramuses, any more than Jacksonian, Confederate and Dixiecrat elites were idiots. They know what they want and they have a plan to get it—which may be more than can be said for their opponents.

Comments