The Last Bonus Thursday Idiocy: Can't Somebody Tell Andrew McCarthy That It Is Harder to Impeach than to Legislate? And That If You Can't Legislate, You Can't Impeach Over the Issues You Can't Legislate?
Andrew McCarthy: Impeachment Lessons :: National Review Online:
The party that controls the House has full primacy over taxing and spending, every bit as much as the party that controls the executive branch has plenary control over prosecution decisions. Constitutional authorities are not contingent on how much, if any, control the party in question has over the rest of government. In theory, then, nothing in government can happen unless the House, with ultimate power over the purse, agrees to fund it. If a corrupt administration uses the IRS as a partisan weapon to audit and harass its detractors, the House can refuse to fund the IRS--or other parts of the executive branch--to quell executive overreach.
Nevertheless, Republicans incessantly tell supporters that, since they control only the House (just 'one-half of one-third of the government', as the tired refrain goes), they are impotent to rein in Obama’s excesses. And when conservatives in the House or Senate urge that Republicans use their command over the purse to stop Obama’s excesses--just as congressional Democrats have historically used the power of the purse to stop Republican presidents from prosecuting the Vietnam War and aiding the Nicaraguan Contras--Republican leadership turns on those conservatives with a ferocity rarely evident in their dealings with the president.
With Democrats energized by Obama’s lawbreaking, and Republicans paralyzed by the prospect of government shutdowns, there is no realistic prospect that Congress will starve Obama of funding. That leaves impeachment as the sole remaining constitutional safeguard....
President Obama is intentionally and sweepingly violating his oath of office... not faithfully executing federal law... his Obamacare and Benghazi lies... woefully derelict in his duty to protect and defend Americans overseas. His administration trumped up a shameful prosecution (under the guise of a “supervised release violation”) against a filmmaker in order to bolster the “Benghazi massacre was caused by an anti-Muslim video” charade. His administration has used the federal bureaucracy to usurp Congress’s legislative powers and to punish political enemies. Obama has presumed to make recess appointments....
His administration intentionally allowed firearms to be transferred to Mexican drug cartels.... His administration... has routinely stonewalled lawmakers and frustrated their capacity to perform agency oversight, to the point that the attorney general has been held in contempt of Congress. The Obama Justice Department, moreover, has filed vexatious lawsuits against sovereign states over their attempts to vindicate their constitutional authorities.... The Justice Department itself adheres to racially discriminatory enforcement policies in violation of the Constitution and federal civil-rights laws.... If the only issue were commission of high crimes and misdemeanors, the Constitution requires only one for impeachment--not the Obama pace, which is more like one per week. But here is the important thing: High crimes and misdemeanors are a subordinate consideration... [for] impeachment.... Its most essential component is the popular political will to remove a president from power.
The charges against Bill Clinton plainly satisfied the “high crimes and misdemeanors” threshold, and he was clearly guilty of them. But the American people obviously did not want Clinton removed over them. That is the lesson of the Clinton impeachment.... Richard Nixon won a landslide reelection in 1972... and resigned to avoid certain impeachment and removal less than two years later. Obama, by contrast, won a fairly close reelection (in which his popular-vote tally dropped by about 4 million from his initial election).... Yet he remains defiant about his agenda--desperately pivoting this week from the Obamacare debacle to that old class-warfare favorite, U.S. “income inequality.” He has signaled every intention to plow ahead for the next three years with unpopular edicts. As he does so, the hard truths about his legacy health-care “reform” will be visited on tens of millions of Americans. Concurrently, his stewardship is making the world an increasingly unstable place. Obama is causing pain, and pain can change people’s minds.... Absent the removal of the president, the United States will be fundamentally transformed.