Liveblogging World War II: April 25, 1945: The Meeting at the River Elbe

Live from La Farine: As I have said before, one important reason I was for Barack Hussein Obama rather than Hillary Rodham Clinton was my belief that America was now more sexist than racist and that Obama would be treated by the Republicans and the political class with the respect appropriate for a serious presidential candidate and for a president.

The second part of that belief was clearly wrong.

The first part, however, may well be right: get ready for the sewage avalanche:

Paul Krugman: Clinton Rules: "So there’s a lot of buzz about alleged scandals involving the Clinton Foundation...

You have to wonder: is this just the return of ‘Clinton rules’? If you are old enough to remember the 1990s, you remember the endless parade of alleged scandals, Whitewater above all--all of them fomented by right-wing operatives, all eagerly hyped by mainstream news outlets, none of which actually turned out to involve wrongdoing. The usual rules didn’t seem to apply; instead it was Clinton rules, under which innuendo and guilt by association were considered perfectly OK, in which the initial suggestion of lawbreaking received front-page headlines and the subsequent discovery that there was nothing there was buried in the back pages if it was reported at all....

So, is this time different? First indications are not encouraging.... Maybe there’s something there. But... we’d all be well advised to follow our own Clinton rules, and be highly suspicious of any reports of supposed scandals... [with] than mere innuendo. Oh, and the news media should probably be aware that this isn’t 1994: there’s a much more effective progressive infrastructure now, much more scrutiny of reporting, and the kinds of malpractice that went unsanctioned 20 years ago can land you in big trouble now.