Previous month:
November 2016
Next month:
January 2017

December 2016

Jeffrey Toobin on Robert Bork: Hoisted from the Internet from Four Years Ago

Hoisted from Others' Archives:

Jeffrey Toobin: Robert Bork, 1927-2012: "Robert Bork, who died Wednesday...

...was an unrepentant reactionary who was on the wrong side of every major legal controversy of the twentieth century. The fifty-eight senators who voted against Bork for confirmation to the Supreme Court in 1987 honored themselves, and the Constitution. In the subsequent quarter-century, Bork devoted himself to proving that his critics were right about him all along.

Continue reading "Jeffrey Toobin on Robert Bork: Hoisted from the Internet from Four Years Ago" »


Must-Read: There is a serious debate about "Uber, floor wax or desert topping?"--excuse me: "Uber: grift or technological and organizational breakthrough?": Izabella Kaminska: Mythbusting Uber’s valuation | Why Uber’s capital costs will creep ever higher. Eric Newcomer: Uber Loses at Least $1.2 Billion in First Half of 2016. Hubert Horan: Can Uber Ever Deliver?: Part 1 | Part 2 | Part 3 | Part 4 | Part 5

Ben Thompson: Reconsidering Uber: "Part 2 is far better, and in many respects redeems the series...

Continue reading "" »


Procrastinating on December 19, 2016

Preview of Procrastinating on November 20 2016

Over at Equitable Growth: Must- and Should-Reads:

Continue reading "Procrastinating on December 19, 2016" »


Monday Smackdown: No, Larry Kudlow Is Not an Economist III

Stupidest Man Alive Nomination: Larry Kudlow: Hoisted from the Archives from 2008: One would think that National Review would want to maintain a smidgeon of a reputation, and hence at least edit Larry Kudlow for his biggest howlers. But no. Eschaton reader js informs Atrios of the stupidity:

Continue reading "Monday Smackdown: No, Larry Kudlow Is Not an Economist III" »


Monday Smackdown: No, Larry Kudlow Is Not an Economist

Clowns (ICP)

I have only been on the same stage as Larry Kudlow twice in my life. In neither case did he provide any intellectual substance at all. This was the second time:

Hoisted from the Archives from 2007: I was sitting on the right end of an nine-person panel at the New School Friday morning http://www.cepa.newschool.edu/events/events_schwartz-lecture.htm#webcast. Bob Solow was sitting on the left end--Solow, Shapiro, Schwartz, Rohatyn, Kudlow, Kerrey, Kosterlitz, Hormats, DeLong. Bob Solow expressed concern and worry over the declines in the U.S. savings rate over the past generation. Larry Kudlow, in the middle of the panel, aggressively launched into an unbalanced and nearly fact-free rant...

Continue reading "Monday Smackdown: No, Larry Kudlow Is Not an Economist" »


Must-Read: I do not get this: it was 21 years ago that I learned--from an early draft of Staiger, Stock, and Watson (1997)--that nobody had any business thinking or acting on any belief that they had the correct estimate of the natural rate. The natural rate shifts. And because the natural rate shifts there is no way to estimate it precisely, even in retrospect, let along in prospect:

Tim Duy: Fed Turns Hawkish: "The FOMC raised the... federal funds rate by 25bp today, as expected...

Continue reading "" »


Must Read: In fact, it is looking less and less likely that the Trump deficits will be the kind of fiscal stimulus reality-based economists interested in economic recovery have been pleading for ever since the financial crisis:

Paul Krugman: Will Fiscal Policy Really Be Expansionary?: "It’s now generally accepted that Trumpism will finally involve the kind of fiscal stimulus progressive economists have been pleading for...

Continue reading "" »


Links for the Week of December 18, 2016

Most-Recent Must-Reads:


Most-Recent Should-Reads:


Most-Recent Links:

Continue reading "Links for the Week of December 18, 2016" »


Procrastinating on December 18, 2016

Preview of Procrastinating on November 20 2016

Over at Equitable Growth: Must- and Should-Reads:

Continue reading "Procrastinating on December 18, 2016" »


(Early) Monday DeLong Smackdown Watch: Has Macroeconomics Gone Right?

U.S. Real GDP since 2009

Has macroeconomics gone right? After three years, how is this working out?...

Paul Krugman (2013): The Neopaleo-Keynesian Counter-counter-Counterrevolution: "OK, I can’t resist this one — and I think it’s actually important...

...Brad DeLong reacts to Binyamin Appelbaum’s piece on Young Frankenstein Stan Fischer by quoting from his own 2000 piece on New Keynesian ideas in macroeconomics, a piece in which he argued that New Keynesian thought was, in important respects, a descendant of old-fashioned monetarism. There’s a lot to that view.

Continue reading "(Early) Monday DeLong Smackdown Watch: Has Macroeconomics Gone Right?" »


Should-Read: The answer is: not precise at all. Nobody should imagine that they know what the NAIRU is right now, or make policy that does not take account of the fact that there is great uncertainty about what the NAIRU is right now:

Douglas O. Staiger, James H. Stock, and Mark W. Watson (1997): How Precise Are Estimates of the Natural Rate of Unemployment?: "Uncertainty arising from not knowing the parameters of the model at hand...

Continue reading "" »


Should-Read: One loose end left in traditional histories of the Reagan administration is why Argentina moved in and occupied the Falkland Islands in 1982. Why didn't the fear a U.K. response supported by the U.S.'s logistical tail? Here David Drake provides an answer: the Argentine generals thought that they had been of so much assistance to the U.S. in its attacks on Nicaragua that the U.S. would stand aside--and it seems likely that policymakers like Jeane Kirkpatrick, Alexander Haig, William Casey and perhaps Zbigniew Brzezinski (if Drake has not written "1979" where he should have written "1981") had led them to believe that it would be so:

David Drake: What Distant Deeps: "Empires have generally used proxies to fight wars on their borders...

Continue reading "" »


Regional Policy and Distributional Policy in a World Where People Want to Ignore the Value and Contribution of Knowledge- and Network-Based Increasing Returns

Preview of Regional Policy and Distributional Policy in a World Where People Want to Ignore the Value and

Pascal Lamy: "When the wise man points at the moon, the fool looks at the finger..."

Perhaps in the end the problem is that people want to pretend that they are filling a valuable role in the societal division of labor, and are receiving no more than they earn--than they contribute.

But that is not the case. The value--the societal dividend--is in the accumulated knowledge of humanity and in the painfully constructed networks that make up our value chains.

Continue reading "Regional Policy and Distributional Policy in a World Where People Want to Ignore the Value and Contribution of Knowledge- and Network-Based Increasing Returns" »


Has Academic Thinking About Countercyclical Fiscal Policy Changed?

Has academic thinking about countercyclical fiscal policy changed recently? I would not say that thinking has changed. I would say that there is a good chance that thinking is changing--that academia is swinging back to a recognition that monetary policy cannot do the stabilization policy by itself, at least not under current circumstances. But it may not be.

Continue reading "Has Academic Thinking About Countercyclical Fiscal Policy Changed?" »


Weekend Reading: John Steinbeck: The 1930s: A Primer: "Everyone Was a Temporarily Embarrassed Capitalist"

Il Quarto Stato

Weekend Reading: John Steinbeck: The 1930s: A Primer: "Except for the field organizers of strikes, who were pretty tough monkeys and devoted...

Continue reading "Weekend Reading: John Steinbeck: The 1930s: A Primer: "Everyone Was a Temporarily Embarrassed Capitalist"" »


Weekend Reading: Chinese Cauldron: Huineng Points at the Moon ~ 惠能指月

Moons

Weekend Reading: Chinese Cauldron: Huineng Points at the Moon ~ 惠能指月: "One evening, the Buddhist nun, Wu Jincang (無盡藏)...

...consulted Huineng, the Sixth Patriarch of Chan (Zen) Buddhism (六祖惠能), for guidance. She said:

I have studied the Mahaparinirvana Sutra (涅槃經) for many years, yet there are many places where the meaning still eludes me. Please would you enlighten me.

Continue reading "Weekend Reading: Chinese Cauldron: Huineng Points at the Moon ~ 惠能指月" »


Weekend Reading: Ideology vs. Pragmatism: David Atkins: Republicans Don’t Care What Works

Clowns (ICP)

Why there will be a lot of policy disasters under our forthcoming unpopular minority government: today's Republicans, fundamentally, do not care whether policies work or not:

Weekend Reading: David Atkins: Republicans Don’t Care What Works: "What little attention the right wing media machine isn’t devoting to the sordid mudslinging between Ted Cruz and Donald Trump...

...is focused on a statement President Obama made about practicalities and ideologies:

Continue reading "Weekend Reading: Ideology vs. Pragmatism: David Atkins: Republicans Don’t Care What Works" »


Should-Read: The more this goes on, the more this looks like Brexiters and Trumpists share an essence: they are all seeking to grab whatever they can while the getting is good, while trying to figure out a way to avoid responsibility and blame for whatever disasters Brexit and Trumpism bring--and there will be disasters. But there will be more disasters if nobody is actually at the tiller. And nobody appears to be--either in Westminster or in Washington:

Philip Stephens: How Brexit May Not Mean Brexit: "Referendums... become a device for demagogues and dictators: the people have spoken so now they must be silent ever more...

Continue reading "" »


Procrastinating on December 16, 2016

Preview of Procrastinating on November 20 2016

Over at Equitable Growth: Must- and Should-Reads:

Continue reading "Procrastinating on December 16, 2016" »


Discussion Questions on Partha Dasgupta: Science and Technology as Institutions

Science and Technology as Institutions

  • What does it mean for knowledge to be "non-rival"?
  • Given that knowledge is "non-rival", what justification could there possibly be for charging people for access to knowledge and its uses?
  • If people weren't allowed to charge others for access to knowledge and its uses, would there be any reason to think that society would be putting a properly-large share of our resources into creating and disseminating knowledge?
  • Why can contests and the rule of priority be good ways to spur the creation and dissemination of knowledge?
  • How well do contests and the rule of priority fit with a private-property market economy?

Partha Dasgupta (2007): Economics: A Very Short Introduction


Discussion Questions on Partha Dasgupta: Sustainable Economic Development

Sustainable Development

  • Why are we destroying our fisheries?
  • Why are we rapidly using up our atmosphere's capacity to absorb carbon dioxide without substantial increases in temperature?
  • Why is such a large chunk of our population potentially short of fresh water?
  • Why have we been able to successfully capture and use 40% of the photosynthesis on earth without already severely disrupting our planet?
  • How have we managed to become so much more numerous and rich since 1800 without rapidly-rising prices of pretty much all natural resources?

Partha Dasgupta (2007): Economics: A Very Short Introduction http://amzn.to/2gR2jH3


Discussion Questions on Partha Dasgupta: Macroeconomic History

Macroeconomic History

  • In the long sweep of human history, is Becky very lucky, lucky, unlucky, or very unlucky?
  • In the long sweep of human history, is Desta very lucky, lucky, unlucky, or very unlucky?
  • How much richer is the world today than it was in the long centuries from 5000 BC to 1800?
  • How much richer are the world's rich today than the world's poor today?
  • What would count as an explanation of this divergence across space and time--that is, what kinds of things would count as "causes" and make you happy that you understood what was going on?
  • How many useful "hierarchies of causation" can you imagine here?

Partha Dasgupta (2007): Economics: A Very Short Introduction http://amzn.to/2gR2jH3


Discussion Questions on Partha Dasgupta: Societal Well-Being and Democratic Government

Societal Well-Being and Democratic Government

  • What are T.H. Marshall's "three revolutions"?
  • Why is each of them important?
  • How does a government based on T.H. Marshall's "three revolutions" tend to promote a prosperous market economy?
  • Does a prosperous market economy tend to promote T.H. Marshall's "Three Revolutions"--and if it does, does it promote them all?

Partha Dasgupta (2007): Economics: A Very Short Introduction http://amzn.to/2gR2jH3


Recommended Reading: Partha Dasgupta's "Economics: A Very Short Introduction"

San Francisco Bay

What I (try to) make my principals students read before class begins; Partha Dasgupta (2007): Economics: A Very Short Introduction http://amzn.to/2gR2jH3. Question: should I try to make my students in my other classes read it too?

Econ 2: Spring 2014: Why We Read Partha Dasgupta:

Me: Note: This is a game theorist's short introduction to economics. Its focus is on:

Continue reading "Recommended Reading: Partha Dasgupta's "Economics: A Very Short Introduction"" »


Must-Read: Let me disagree a bit with Paul: although evidence does suggest that we are near full employment, we are not at full employment--and the suggestion that we are near full employment is a very weak one. The unemployment rate is 4.6%--and six years ago I would have said that 5% unemployment is full employment. The prime-age employment-to-population ratio is 78.1%--and six years ago I would have said that an 80% prime-age employment-to-population ratio is full employment. It is possible to reconcile the two by saying that hysteresis has permanently knocked 2% of the prime-age population out of the labor force. But that claim is, itself, uncertain.

Paul rests his case for continued monetary policy at the zero lower bound and for fiscal expansion on the "precautionary motive". That case is there, and is very strong. But IMHO there is still a very strong case for continued monetary policy at the zero lower bound and fiscal expansion resulting from recognition of our uncertainty about the current state of the economy.

The downsides of further expansionary policy to see if full employment is an 80% prime-age employment-to-population ratio are small. The upsides are large. We should follow Rikki-Tikki-Tavi, and run and find out.

Paul Krugman: Notes on the Macroeconomic Situation: "So the Fed has raised rates... a mistake, although not as severe... as it would have been a year ago....

Continue reading "" »


More Expansionary FIscal Policy Is Needed: The Only Question Is Whether for a Short-Term Full Employment Attainment or a Medium-Term Full-Employment Maintenance Purpose

J. Bradford DeLong: On Twitter:

Continue reading "More Expansionary FIscal Policy Is Needed: The Only Question Is Whether for a Short-Term Full Employment Attainment or a Medium-Term Full-Employment Maintenance Purpose" »


Procrastinating on December 14, 2016

Preview of Procrastinating on November 20 2016

Over at Equitable Growth: Must- and Should-Reads:

Continue reading "Procrastinating on December 14, 2016" »


What Is the Excellence of an Economist?

I have been thinking about John Maynard Keynes's observations on the mysterious difficulty of being a first-class economist that I quoted a while ago:

John Maynard Keynes (1924): Alfred Marshall: "The study of economics does not seem to require...

Continue reading "What Is the Excellence of an Economist?" »