Econ 191 Spring 2012 Feed

DeLong Smackdown/Monday Worth Reading: Dan Kervick and Matt Bruenig

Critics... well, probably better to call them "friends" have pointed out to me that last summer I didn't spend enough time linking to Dan Kervick's and Matt Brunig's contributions to the Piketty debate. I remember reading them at the time. And I cannot figure out why I didn't focus more on them--save probably because both seemed to me to be thinking along the lines I was thinking along, I didn't think that there was much new there. But usually I am anxious to promote people saying things that I think are smart and right, so it is a puzzle...

Continue reading "DeLong Smackdown/Monday Worth Reading: Dan Kervick and Matt Bruenig" »


Econ 191: April 17, 2011: Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy

Download 20120417 econ 191 fiscal policy in a depressed economy

Five years ago, there was a near-complete consensus that aggregate demand management was the exclusive province of central banks and their conventional open-market operations. Problems of legislative process of implementation meant that fiscal policy worked more slowly than conventional monetary policy. Even should an economy find itself in a liquidity trap, whatever that means, credible commitments by central banks to hit future nominal spending and nominal exchange rate targets still seemed to dominate fiscal policy.

Today because we are in a depressed economy we think differently. Or do we? How differently do we think, and why?

Suggestions that we should move away from exclusive reliance on central banks and conventional open-market operations in a liquidity trap have three possible justifications:

  • Our uncertainty about what is the right model of the economy.
  • Our belief that conventional open-market operation monetary policy tools weaken in situations like the depressed economy of the present--that in a depressed economy there is a lack of power on the part of central banks.
  • A possible lack of will on the part of central banks: a belief on the part of central bankers that while spending flows ought to be higher, it ought to be elected governments that take steps to make it so.

Continue reading "Econ 191: April 17, 2011: Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy" »


Econ 191: Spring 2012: U.C. Berkeley: Fiscal Policy in the Great Recession (April 17, 2012)

Readings:

Readings from David Romer and Christina Romer: Econ 134: Macroeconomic Policy from the Great Depression to the Great Recession:

  • Extending the IS/MP/IA Framework Slides
    • David H. Romer, Short-Run Fluctuations (open access, 2012), Section IV, “The Liquidity Trap”
  • The Zero Lower Bound in Practice Slides
    • Ben S. Bernanke, “Japanese Monetary Policy: A Case of Self-Induced Paralysis?” in Ryoichi Mikitani and Adam S. Posen, eds., Japan’s Financial Crisis and Its Parallels to U.S. Experience, pp. 149-166 (Washington, D.C.: Institute for International Economics, 2000).
    • Peter Temin and Barrie A. Wigmore, “The End of One Big Deflation,” Explorations in Economic History 27 (October 1990): 483-502
    • Joseph Gagnon, Matthew Raskin, Julie Remache, and Brian Sack, “The Financial Market Effects of the Federal Reserve's Large-Scale Asset Purchases,” International Journal of Central Banking 7 (March 2011): 3-25 and 38- 40 only
  • Does Fiscal Policy Matter? Slides
    • Robert E. Hall, “By How Much Does GDP Rise If the Government Buys More Output?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Fall 2009): 183-195 only
    • Valerie A. Ramey and Matthew D. Shapiro, “Costly Capital Reallocation and the Effects of Government Spending,” Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 48 (1998): 145-147 and 174-189 only.
    • Christina D. Romer and David H. Romer, “The Macroeconomic Effects of Tax Changes: Estimates Based on a New Measure of Fiscal Shocks,” American Economic Review 100 (June 2010): 763-787 only
  • Fiscal Policy in the Great Recession Slides
    • John Taylor, “The Lack of an Empirical Rationale for a Revival of Discretionary Fiscal Policy,” American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 99 (May 2009): 550-555.
    • Christina D. Romer, “The Case for Fiscal Stimulus: The Likely Effects of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act,” Speech at the U.S. Monetary Policy Forum, February 27, 2009.
    • Council of Economic Advisers, “The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 First Quarterly Report,” September 10, 2009, pp. 1-17 and 23-40 only.

Continue reading "Econ 191: Spring 2012: U.C. Berkeley: Fiscal Policy in the Great Recession (April 17, 2012)" »


Econ 191: U.C. Berkeley: Spring 2012: April 3, 2012: David Romer: Monetary Policy at the Zero Nominal Interest Rate Lower Bound

April 3. Professor David Romer: Monetary Policy at the Zero Lower Bound:


Econ 191: UC Berkeley: Spring 2012: Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy: April 17, 2012

Fiscal Policy in a Depressed Economy

April 17, 6:30-9:00 PM, 105 Northgate

Readings: